Sony didn’t want cross-play on PS4 and PS5 — here’s why

When it comes to console cross-play, Sony has always seemed a piddling hesitant compared to its rivals in Nintendo and Microsoft. In fact, it wasn't until a significant public outcry in 2018 that Sony finally allowed the functionality starting with boxing royal behemoth, Fortnite.

Prior to this Sony had been extremely reluctant to play ball, blocking cross-play on games such as Rocket League and Minecraft. Documents that have come to light during the ongoing Ballsy Games versus Apple lawsuit, have given united states details on Sony'due south demands that ultimately allowed gamers on PlayStation to play Fortnite (and other games) with friends on separate systems.

PS5 restock update today: Track on Twitter, Walmart, Target and more
iOS 14.v guide — meet the biggest new features for your iPhone
Plus: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti release could be delayed — simply it'southward still coming shortly

Afterward the backlash, which was primarily pb past Fortnite players, Sony agreed to let cantankerous-play on its platform in September 2018 but with the stipulation that it received compensation based on how much a game earned on a competing platform. The manner this payment organisation works is outlined in a "cross-platform revenue share" understanding that Sony fabricated (and may still make) publishers sign before the functionality can be enabled on PlayStation systems.

The acquirement split is outlined below. Information technology boils down to the fact Sony believes it's unfair if a higher percentage of agile players employ its platform than the percentage of players who are buying in-game purchases. So if 95% of Fortnite players were playing through PlayStation, just only sixty% of the acquirement the game earned was through PlayStation transactions, Sony demands boosted revenue to account for the difference.

PlayStation cross-platform revenue share — (Paradigm credit: Sony)

Sony's justification for this understanding is that it prevents the situation where a majority of a game's player base of operations is on its platform, while a asymmetric corporeality of revenue is earned on another platform. Sony is using this agreement to ensure that it receives a fair portion of acquirement for essentially lending its user base to its competitors.

This document was first created in 2019, so it's possible that Sony's stance on cantankerous-play has inverse in the years since. Although based on comments made by Epic CEO Tim Sweeney that seems fairly unlikely, information technology was besides confirmed that Sony is the only platform holder to have this sort of compensation system in identify.

Epic CEO Tim Sweeney just confirmed that Sony is the only platform holder that requires Epic to pay compensation for crossplay. Ballsy had to hold to pay these additional fees to enable crossplay in Fortnite.May three, 2021

Run into more

Even later on Epic twisted Sony arms to allow cross-play for Fortnite, and the feature has at present been rolled out to boosted titles like Phone call of Duty: Warzone and Destiny 2, Sony even so seems unwilling to fully open up its platform to encompass gamers non playing on PS4 or PS5.

While Microsoft is championing cantankerous-play and cross-progression with its extensive backward compatibility offerings on the Xbox Series 10 and deep integration with PC gaming through Windows, Sony is decidedly more reluctant to permit gamers to play across the confines of a single system.

What'due south most disappointing about this document being made public noesis, is that information technology shows that Sony didn't accept a change of heart back in 2018 and come across the value of cross-play for gamers. Instead, it shows that cross-play is simply permitted on PlayStation then long as it remains a coin earner for Sony, and should that change we tin but assume that Sony would revert back to its hard-line stance.

As it stands cross-play is pretty evenly matched across the 2 platforms when information technology comes to multi-platform games at to the lowest degree. But perhaps in the future, Microsoft might make up one's mind information technology wants its own revenue sharing system in place if Sony isn't going to play brawl without ane. That could atomic number 82 to cross-play condign much rarer in the hereafter as publishers determine information technology's only non worth the hassle of having to come to individual acquirement-sharing agreements with multiple platform holders.

Sweetening the pot for Sony

This cross-play acquirement share understanding isn't the only interesting Sony-related morsel to come out of the Ballsy Games versus Apple tree lawsuit hearing.

We've also got details on how Epic attempted to sweeten the pot for Sony to go the Japanese tech giant to allow Fortnite cross-play on PlayStation platforms. Epic'south Joe Kreiner was fairly bullish in an early on 2018 email exchange declaring that "I tin can't think of a scenario where Epic doesn't get what we desire" and declaring Fortnite the "biggest game on PlayStation," which in fairness is likely still accurate.

Kreiner attempted to entice Sony with the offer of sharing valuable marketing data, cross-promoting Fornite and PlayStation at that year'due south E3 showcase, And promised that Epic would "brand Sony look like heroes" when announcing full cross-play support.

The negotiations went a step further too. Kreiner pitched a potential exclusive PSVR title downwards the line and even attempted to tighten the screw on Sony past pointing out that the company's license on Ballsy's Unreal Engine four would be upwardly for renegotiation the post-obit year.

Sony seemed pretty unmoved by Epic's offers, with the company's onetime senior manager Gio Corsi writing back: "There are a lot of corking ideas in here for connected partnership however cross-platform play is not a slam dunk no matter the size of the championship. As you know, many companies are exploring this thought and not a single i tin explicate how cross-console play improves the PlayStation business."

This stance would later soften, clearly thanks to the creation of the acquirement sharing scheme as outlined above. While these discussions are plainly water nether the bridge at this point, it's still extremely fascinating to become a rare glimpse at how these powerful companies negotiate terms backside closed doors.

The Epic Games versus Apple lawsuit is being fought over Epic's attempts to circumvent Apple's App Store fees, with the game publisher arguing that Apple has prepare upward an unfair monopoly in return. The hearing is currently ongoing and could well reveal further behind-the-curtain information about the tech world before reaching its conclusion.

Back to Sony and its reluctance to hands cover cross-play, such a stance could exist detrimental to future PS5 games, as some developers might not want to enter into the revenue sharing agreement Sony seems to impose.

Now Sony'south stance may have changed, and we're till seeking clarity on that. Simply the PS5 is a console you go are more than likely to choose because of its current and futurity exclusive games, like Horizon Forbidden West, not cross-play. So far, it looks like the Xbox Series X and overall Xbox ecosystem is friendlier towards cross-play.